Centralized risk records
Track risks as connected records — each with an owner, a category, and an inherent and residual rating — instead of a disconnected spreadsheet.
Record risks with an owner, an inherent and residual rating, and a treatment decision — and move each one through a reviewable approval workflow, with every risk linked to the vendor, assessment, or finding behind it.
Risk that lives in scattered spreadsheets is hard to own and harder to defend at audit. VeriGRC centralizes risk as connected records: each one has an owner, an inherent and residual rating, and a treatment decision — and moves through a review-and-approval workflow so the history behind every decision stays reviewable. Risk is not eliminated; it is tracked, owned, and decided on by the people accountable for it.
Centralized records, clear ownership, real treatment decisions, and a reviewable history behind each one.
Track risks as connected records — each with an owner, a category, and an inherent and residual rating — instead of a disconnected spreadsheet.
Every risk has an owner who proposes a treatment and an approver who reviews it — so accountability for a risk is explicit, not assumed.
Choose a treatment for each risk — remediate, accept, transfer, avoid, or monitor — and record the justification behind the choice.
Risks move through a clear workflow — draft, review, approve, return, or deny — and approved acceptances can expire and be renewed, all captured in an audit trail.
A risk links to the vendor, assessment, or finding it came from, so the context behind a rating is one click away — not lost in a separate file.
AI can help surface and summarize risk from your assessments and findings and point to where attention is needed — while the decision to accept or treat a risk stays with your team.
Accepting a risk should not mean forgetting it. When a risk is formally accepted, the decision is owned, justified, and time-bound — and as its expiry approaches, it surfaces for renewal so an accepted risk gets a fresh look instead of quietly lingering. The decisions stay with the people accountable for them, backed by a reviewable history.
Risk is not a separate ledger. Records link to your third-party risk, vendor security ratings, and external attack surface signals, connect to your compliance controls and audit reporting, roll up into role-based dashboards, and are available to the AI Assistant. Explore the full platform.
A risk register is a centralized record of the risks an organization is tracking, each with an owner, a rating, and a decision about how it will be handled. In VeriGRC, risks are connected records with inherent and residual ratings, a treatment decision, and a reviewable history — linked to the vendors, assessments, and findings behind them.
Each risk can be assigned a treatment — remediate, accept, transfer, avoid, or monitor — along with the justification behind the choice. VeriGRC tracks the decision and its history; it does not eliminate risk on its own.
Risk acceptance follows a review workflow: a risk owner proposes a treatment and submits it, and an approver reviews and approves, returns, or denies it. Accountability for the decision stays with people, not automation.
Yes. A formally accepted risk can be time-bound, and as its expiry approaches it surfaces for renewal — so an accepted risk gets a fresh review rather than lingering unnoticed. Every step is recorded in an audit trail.
AI can help surface and summarize risks from your assessments and findings and suggest where attention is needed. It assists and recommends; the decision to accept or treat a risk remains with your team.
Because the platform shares one data model, risks link to third-party risk, security ratings, and external attack surface signals, connect to your compliance controls and audit reporting, roll up into role-based dashboards, and are available to the AI Assistant in context.
Book a walkthrough and see third-party risk, compliance, and audit evidence on one platform.